Im hoping someone can give me some feedback on the two rulings I made recently.
Situation 1 - On the river Player A bets and Player B calls. Player A pushes his hand face-down over the line, releases them, but then quickly turns them face-up. Player B still has not shown his hand.
For me this hand is clearly live, Player A had King high, I guess he had second thoughts on showing it. But the hand was turned face-up by himself before the dealer took it and also before Player B showed his hand.
The next one is slightly trickier
Situation 2 - Two players go to a showdown, Player A shows his hand which is AK for ace high. Player B throws his hand face down towards the dealer and they cross over the board cards, but do not touch the muck. Player B then realises he had the winning hand and asks the dealer to turn his hand face-up, at this point Iam called to the table and some players are claiming Player B has folded his hand. The dealer explains what has happened so far. I ask the dealer where Player B cards are, she tells me they are still under her hand ( between the board cards and the muck) I then ask if Player B hand touched the muck? Dealer said no they haven't. I asked was she 100% sure they were his cards, dealer said they were 100% sure, the players also agreed they were deffinetly Player B cards. The dealer also told me they didnt have time to even put them in the muck, as it all happened so fast, when the dealer put their hand on Player B cards to pull them into the muck Player B asked for them to be shown.
As the pot had not been awarded, Player B hand had not been mucked or touched the muck, and Player A had shown first, this was just a case of misreading of hands, I ruled the hand live and turned it face-up, to show the winning hand.
Thanks,
Desi