I have been polling some of my local TD’s lately about the following scenario which happened to me last week. Tournament blinds are 400 - 800 it folds around small blind who says nothing throws out a 5000 unit chip and takes back 2 of the 4 (100 unit chips). I then get called to the table listen to the scenario and I rule that it is a call because the player threw out 1 oversized chip and said nothing. The player complained that he removed 2 of the small blind chips while putting in the 5000. I told the player that if he would have picked up all the chips from the sb and then thrown them back in with the 5000 it would be a raise, and I again ruled it a call.
Test yourself - Call or Raise?
Tournament, Blinds are 400 - 800. It folds around to the small blind who says nothing and then -
1- The sb does not touch the 400 and throws in a 5000 unit chip. Call or Raise?
2- The sb takes all 4 of the 100 unit chips and throws out a 5000 unit chip. Call or Raise?
3-The sb takes off 2 of the 4, (100 unit chips) and throws in a 5000 unit chip. Call or Raise?
I see these as calls
Next
Tournament blinds are 400 - 800 utg +2 raises to 2200, it folds around to the small blind who says nothing and then -
4- The sb does not touch the 400 and throws in a 5000 unit chip. Call or Raise?
5 -The sb takes off 2 of the 4, (100 unit chips) and throws in a 5000 unit chip. Call or Raise?
I see these as calls as well
Why is it that I find so many players and some TD’s who disagree with my ruling?


? I got to believe you folks will agree with me.
TDA Rule # 32. Oversized Chip
Anytime when facing a bet (or blind), placing a single oversized chip in the pot is a call if a raise is not first verbally declared. To raise with a single oversized chip, a declaration must be made before the chip hits the table surface. If a raise is declared (but not an amount), the raise is the maximum allowable for that chip. When not facing a bet, placing an oversized chip in the pot without declaration is a bet of the maximum allowable for the chip.
Am I missing something here?

?
I’ve said it before and I say it again, If a player makes their action unclear, then they will have no idea what ruling they will get from the TD. But it would be nice if we could clarify this.
I would appreciate your input.
Thanks