I have some questions regarding the new 2011 rules.
# 8. Balancing Tables B
I am having difficulty understanding, or trying to follow, the placement of the button. Maybe using seat #'s might help?
#9: Number of Players at Final Table. I have known for years that stud tournaments played 9 at the final table. I just want to know why?
#38 Raises: (formerly TDA Rule #31) Before attending the 2011 Summit, I was told that the Discusion Forum was the best way to bring a rule to the table for change. During the past 18 months nothing brought more to the forum, or was debated more than Rule #31, yet the rule remains exactly as it was in 2009? Over a year ago, I was told that the rule would be addressed.
#42 Anyone that follows the Forum, or was at the Summit, knows how I feel about Accepted Action. IMO, the slight changes in wording from the WSOP rule #91 is not enough. Underlining the last sentence of rule #37 only adds to the confusion. Also, adding rule #1 is another indication that more work is needed on this one. Suggestions: Shared responsibility from all parties involved in the hand, the bettor, the dealer and the caller.
During the summit, the Venetian had an excellent rule about accepted action. Everyone applauded when it was read. Shortly after that it was requested that it be read again, but it could not be located. I'd like to see that one in writing.
I thought that combining the last line of #37 with #42 would be better than just adding rule #1.
Your thoughts.