Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Live Cash Game Rules Questions / All in "announced" misunderstanding
« Last post by Sammyy90 on Today at 02:02:32 PM »
Hey folks, had one of those situations that shows up every 4 years ish and puts the experience to the test.

I'll try to give as much information as I can so bare with me.
HU, game is 2.5/2.5 euro
Player 1 stack size 2500 euro
Player 2 stack size 700 euro
Pot size 220 euro

Board QcJc9d7sTs

Player 1 "announces" all in and throws in a 10 euro chip, player 2 insta calls what the he believes is a 10 euro bet with QJ, player 1 has AK. Dealer hesitated but chose to say he believed it was said all in but had no time to announce the action.
Player 1 was seated on seat 6 and player 2 on seat 8, seat 2 announced he heard player 2 say all in but no other player backed that up.

The decision was that player 2 called 10 euro and did not have to put in the remaining 690, it wasnt an easy decision and its very rare that I feel I need to discuss with my colleagues what I feel the decision should be before I deliver it. However this is in my opinion a "sensitive one", so its better to shuffle more heads. None of my colleagues were quite comfortable in either decision that could be delivered.
Why?
So there are a lot of variables I started to think about here.
Pot size was one of them, an extreme over bet but I assumed it was a great move when player 1 hit the gutshot.
The QJ call is what made me believe this is a misunderstanding first, the 10 euro chip is also nothing but an instigator for confusion.
Even though a verbal action has been made the action has to be clear, and even the dealer hesitated. How seat 2 heard the all in is beyond me, could be that the other players just did not want to pick a side in such a situation.
I know both of the players to be experienced.
So obviously any 8 or K makes a straight so to think player 2 would call anything else than a 10-30 euro bet I feel is out of the question. This felt more like a call just to see the cards and accept his fate. Im no hollywood expert either but the reaction seemed to be genuine when player 2 heard what was actually happening.
Now I'm a player myself whenever I travel and I've been playing for about 10 years, when I announce any action I always make it clear to the dealer, or I place chips that are enough to cover the all in of my opponent without a verbal action. The 10 euro chip for me has no function whatsoever. To whisper all in feels extremely sketchy to me.
Obviously player 1 was extremely upset about this.
The 2 major mistakes that were made this hand is 1 from each player.
Player 1: Unclear in his action
Player 2: Insta reacting without being sure what is actually happening
If the dealer would have the time to announce the all in and the call was made is pretty straight forward, however that is not the case. A few players approached me discussing about verbal actions during that evening.

Short version:
Player 1 announced all in with a 10 euro chip and a very low tone that can be misunderstood
Player 2 insta called what he thought was a 10 euro bet but got told it was an all in

What are your thoughts on this? Once again the dealer did hesitate but was quite sure it was announced all in after rethinking.
2
Hello,

I know the rooms & casinos have different rules about that but what are your opinion about the registered (or qualified) players that are very late or never arrive?

1) You don't touch their full stacks during x rounds then you retire them (do you pay back those who paid?)
2) You blind off their stacks during x rounds then you retire them (do you pay back those who paid?)
2) You blind off their stacks until they are eliminated (so you identify each stack with a name?) 

TY in advance - GG
3
2024 POKER TDA SUMMIT XI / Re: what are the hot topics for this year?
« Last post by Dave Miller on May 17, 2024, 07:48:52 AM »
Thanks for the explanation. That makes sense. You didn’t mention the obvious: that the SM also gets to take his SB back. The entire pot is the single chip ante.


Here's my ruling: It sucks, but if chopped, the odd chip goes to the small blind - left of the button. While it's true that if we weren't doing ante first, this wouldn't even be a question, this unique situation is no reason to consider not doing ante first.

Frankly, we shouldn't even consider making a rule for this very rare situation. A player that allowed himself to get into such a low stack situation must suffer the consequences. Sucks to be you buddy, but rules are rules.

Before anyone tries to invoke the rule that you can't be eliminated during a color-up race, that's a different situation, with no rules regarding player position.
4
Poker TDA Rules & Procedures Questions, General / Re: Is it a premature river?
« Last post by BROOKS on May 16, 2024, 06:16:19 PM »
Substantial Action isn't the "end all, be all" to making rulings.

Take a missing burn card for example:

If dealer forgets to burn before the flop, and there has been ANY action, the flop stays.
If a player checks, on a flop of A49, we can't say, well there wasn't substantial action - let's flip em over, scramble and select a random card to be the burn. Now what if the flop becomes 249 and the player that already checked now bets?

So since the rule in this case would be that the flop stays, even with 1 check, I believe in your situation, the river card should've stayed.
5
2024 POKER TDA SUMMIT XI / Re: what are the hot topics for this year?
« Last post by BROOKS on May 16, 2024, 06:07:18 PM »
If the BB is all in for just the ante amount, or even less than the ante amount, and it's the smallest chip in play.
Folds to SB, who has to put in 0 chips.
The entire pot is just this 1 chip for the ante.
Both players have the same hand, chop.
Who gets the pot?
6
2024 POKER TDA SUMMIT XI / Re: what are the hot topics for this year?
« Last post by Dave Miller on May 12, 2024, 12:48:01 PM »
I was hoping to attend for the first time, but I have a family obligation. ☹️

I've also seen several questions about being 'chopped' out of a tournament - which is crazy if you ask me. I am planning on bringing that up and hopefully most people agree that you shouldn't be knocked out of a tournament when you have the best hand.
I'm clueless on this. Can you give an example?
7
Poker TDA Rules & Procedures Questions, General / Re: Is it a premature river?
« Last post by karlovic on May 11, 2024, 11:31:21 PM »
Quote
What was he going to do, wait for everyone to have acted on the river, and then say something?

In that case, the solution is simple: if another player acts, there's substantial action, making it easier to resolve the issue since the rules state that if there's substantial action, the river stands, and actions proceed as normal.

However, the difficulty here lies in the fact that with UTG not having acted and the two previous actions not involving chips, there's no substantial action, and the river could be considered a premature river.

Although I don't agree with treating it as a premature river, as I feel it gives BB an opportunity to gain an advantage, since they can decide whether to announce the error or not at their convenience.
8
Poker TDA Rules & Procedures Questions, General / Re: Is it a premature river?
« Last post by BROOKS on May 11, 2024, 08:53:40 PM »
There are always going to be crazy situations that there isn't a clear cut rule for, and we just have to make the best decision we can, with the information that we have.

I wouldn't have ruled that as a premature river.

The fact that the SB didn't say anything once the river came out, AND he acted (checked) on this supposed premature card???
Absolutely not.

Not only did he act, but another player also acted on this card, and a 3rd player was about to.

In Rule 2 - Players Responsibilities, it says Players must defend their right to act. I feel as though this falls under that same way of thinking, you need to defend your action. If he had raised, he needed to speak up. He wasn't even the one that brought it up, it was the BB that said something. What was he going to do, wait for everyone to have acted on the river, and then say something?

9
2024 POKER TDA SUMMIT XI / Re: what are the hot topics for this year?
« Last post by BROOKS on May 11, 2024, 08:44:44 PM »
Big Blind Ante is def gonna come up again. Need to get a consensus so everyone can just agree to do it the same way.
Whether is Ante first (the right way), or BB first, we just need consistency.
Also discussing whether or not to reduce the size of the BB ante on a Final Table once it becomes shorthanded.

The most common thing people are confused about is raising/calling with prior existing chips. The rules are a bit confusing and are not being applied consistently. They are easily misinterpreted and hopefully can be reworded and explained so that it is straightforward and no chance of being interpreted several ways.

I've also seen several questions about being 'chopped' out of a tournament - which is crazy if you ask me. I am planning on bringing that up and hopefully most people agree that you shouldn't be knocked out of a tournament when you have the best hand.
10
2024 POKER TDA SUMMIT XI / Re: Registration is now open
« Last post by BROOKS on May 11, 2024, 08:44:03 PM »
When is the TDA tournament?  Any special room rates available this year?

You can contact Jake Stubing the poker host at the Aria jstubing@aria.com
The reduced rates for the weekdays are decent, but Friday and Saturday are still pretty pricey.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10