PokerTDA
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2013, 04:27:08 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
SMF - Just Installed!
7559 Posts in 822 Topics by 1748 Members
Latest Member: hittertwo
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  PokerTDA
|-+  POKER TOURNAMENT RULES QUESTIONS & DISCUSSIONS
| |-+  Suggestions for new TDA rules and amendments to existing rules READ-ONLY ARCHIVES (Pre 2011 Summit)
| | |-+  Any rules changes/ clarifications needed wrt the RDW/Reinkemeier incident?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Any rules changes/ clarifications needed wrt the RDW/Reinkemeier incident?  (Read 790 times)
MikeB
Administrator
TDA Member & Veteran Poster
*****
Posts: 438



« on: May 25, 2010, 11:06:34 AM »

The RDW / Reinkemeier incident at the EPT Barcelona was one of the most widely discussed events in recent poker history. Are there any rulings or clarifications that are needed as a result of the issues involved in this hand?

For example:

1) As one specific issue, is there such a thing as "legitimate showdown gamesmanship" during which the dealer should not interfere...
2) Or should the dealer always move aggressively to take charge of a showdown and request that cards be tabled?

« Last Edit: June 04, 2010, 06:38:18 PM by MikeB » Logged
Nick C
TDA Member & Veteran Poster
***
Posts: 1838



WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2010, 06:15:02 AM »

Mike,

 I am all for the dealer taking charge at the showdown. There are specific procedures that must be followed. The incident in Barcelona was a good example of the dealer taking charge of the situation. The dealer asked the initial bettor to show his complete hand (both cards), instead, he showed only one (the king) and actually slid the other into the muck.

 What I consider to be the duties of a dealer at the showdown; a) Ask to see the cards of the player who initiated the last bet or raise, first.  Example "sir, I need to see all of the cards before I can read your hand." b.) Stop any opposing player from showing their hand until the first hand is properly tabled (face-up horizontal on the table). c.) Muck all discarded hands, immediately. d.) Kill the losing hands and push the pot to the winner.

  There will always be exeptions to the normal process that are accepted and prefered. Example; Player A checks, Player B checks (holding the "nuts") hoping that one of the other players will bet, so he can check raise. All of the remaining players check (to the disappointment of Player B)...so, even though he is not following the correct order of showdown, it is in the best interest of the game, to not waste time by turning over the nut hand and get on with the next deal.


That's my vote.
Nick C
Logged
Martin L. Waller
TDA Member & Veteran Poster
***
Posts: 55


« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2010, 09:32:53 PM »

Mike,

I don’t see any reason for this incident to cause an additional rule.
I do agree with Nick that the dealer has to keep control of his table but without understanding the audio I don’t know why the dealer retrieved the cards from the muck.
If no one asked to see them the cards should have stayed in the muck.
If someone did ask to see them they were dead because they had been placed in the muck.
It may have inspired many discussions but IMO it doesn’t require another rule.

Good game to you,
Martin
Logged
Stuart Murray
TDA Member & Veteran Poster
***
Posts: 613



WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2010, 08:00:07 AM »

ditto, Nick and Martin's posts

Stuart
Logged

Stuart Murray
The Nuts Poker League
South Scotland &
National Tournament Director
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!